![]() 08/19/2016 at 10:55 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
In 1955, GM had just gotten away with this -
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
. Surely 3 years would be enough time for a high-scooped fender line, cheek holes in the fenders, gull shape tail, high position headlights, and a narrow grill to become accepted-yet-cutting-edge, right? The answer was no, but you could forgive Ford for thinking it might be - and nobody else was using it...
![]() 08/19/2016 at 11:40 |
|
The problem with the Edsel was the vagina grille, not the styling
![]() 08/19/2016 at 12:22 |
|
There were other points of awkwardness other than that, and they tried to water down everything across the board with the ‘59.
Exaggerated narrow ovoid or shield shapes weren’t anything new, but they were out of the norm by that point.
It’s valid that the grill on the ‘58 Edsel being a *hole* rather than an outline was a problem and led to a very popular“can’t unsee” effect that didn’t help at all, but fixing that and going to a filled in version and what was already well-tread ground didn’t solve things either -there were deeper problems. Styling issues with the ‘58 start with “vulva”, but don’t end there.
![]() 08/19/2016 at 12:47 |
|
I’m calling it. This was a red herring to bait Ford into doing something stupid.
![]() 08/19/2016 at 13:04 |
|
If so, well done. This thing has a fuckin’ Marvel Comics Skrull chin.